Central African Republic: Controversy over a bill on “foreign agents”
A draft law being prepared in the Central African Republic aimed at regulating the activities of “foreign agents” is raising concerns among civil society organizations, NGOs, the media, and international partners. Scheduled to be examined in parliament this Friday, the text was finally sent back to the government by the National Assembly Commission for “additional information”, as indicated this Thursday by sources in Bangui.
A broad definition and binding requirements
The draft text designates as “foreign agents” individuals or organizations, whether Central African or foreign, receiving “support or assistance” from abroad. The targets include political activities, the collection of military and technical intelligence, and the dissemination of messages described as “insurrectional.” The bill also requires these agents to register with the authorities and provide an accounting report every six months, as well as details of their programs and media activities.
Civil society opposition and international concern
This text, perceived as liberticidal by a part of the population, has led to a significant mobilization: 44 national associations signed a petition demanding its withdrawal, presented Thursday to the National Assembly by the Network of Civil Society Organizations for Governance and Development (ROSCA-GD). Moïse Adoumbaye, representative of ROSCA-GD, warned of the restrictive effects of this bill, highlighting the risks for civil liberties and international cooperation.
Protecting national sovereignty, a government argument
Faced with criticism, government spokesman Maxime Balalou justified the project by the need to protect the country against alleged “infiltrations”, particularly within NGOs. He mentioned the possible presence of former military personnel within certain organizations and specified that “the text is not yet complete.”
Conclusion
The “foreign agents” bill illustrates a dilemma for the Central African Republic: protecting its national sovereignty while maintaining cooperation with international partners essential to its development. The final decision could affect the country’s economic and humanitarian support, while potentially marking a turning point for civil rights and freedom of expression.
